I am suspicious that the compiler build itself was done with at least some optimizations turned off. In the q2 7. In the q4 8. By comparison, in the Arch build of arm-none-eabi-gcc for gcc8, which is 8. Perhaps the builder turned off optimization for debugging and forgot to turn it back on? Or was there some other reason? I haven't yet tried to build from source, or examine the source Makefiles.
Terry, Thanks for reporting and analyzing the issue. It is a confirmed bug in the build script and has just been fixed, in a way slightly different to what you shared. The updated script and binary package will be included in the next release.
Thanks for fixing this bug. Collectives on Stack Overflow. Learn more. Why does GCC compile itself 3 times? Ask Question. Asked 1 year, 8 months ago. Active 1 year, 5 months ago.
Viewed 1k times. What benefit does this serve? This answer says: Build new version of GCC with existing C compiler re-build new version of GCC with the one you just built optional repeat step 2 for verification purposes. Is it just for verification? If so, it seems pretty wasteful. I mean the whole compiler is written in C right, so why not just do everything in one pass?
What is the use of the 3-phase bootstrap? Thanks in advance. Improve this question. The meaning of "it" in the phrase "why waste time rebuilding it? See the new and more in depth answer below. The last two stages are far from a waste of time. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. If you prefer non-bootstrap for some reason, configure --disable-bootstrap. Improve this answer. Improve this answer. Thanks for documenting this. It's very useful to have a reference! You can accept your own answer as the solution to your question to pass the message that your query was answered : — goncalotomas.
Mine takes 4 hours and 20 minutes, single thread with 16 concurrent compiling tasks Ryzen 7 X. Hi, do you remember how long it took to download the prerequisites? I ran. It just seems to be stuck. How do I know if things are even getting downloaded? I'm working behind a proxy so I'm not sure.
Portage 2. Hi, Code:. Is this a laptop? Not a laptop, no frequency scaling at all. Could it be this? Posted: Tue Jun 15, am Post subject:.
Nope, I was asking to Doorbreath. Shining Arcanine wrote:.
0コメント